Laidback as a Metaview alternative
Metaview is excellent at interview intelligence: transcripts, structured feedback, hiring manager alignment. If your biggest pain point is the interview itself, keep it. If the pain starts earlier and ends later, the gap is everything around the interview.
Set up in minutes. No card required.
The best interview process in the world cannot evaluate candidates who never make it to interview.
Sourcing, scoring, coordination and follow through
From the first brief in a channel
Built from the open web plus your existing records
The difference in one table.
The interview is not the whole hire
I find the people
Profiles built from shipped work, papers, talks and repositories, so the shortlist contains people who never appeared in a profile search.
I score before the call
Every candidate is ranked against your real bar with evidence attached, so the interview is a confirmation, not a discovery.
I keep the loop moving
Drafted outreach, follow ups, scheduling and ATS updates happen in the same thread, with approval before anything external sends.
Where Metaview still wins
If your primary need is better interview feedback, structured scorecards and hiring manager alignment, Metaview is purpose built for that.
What it looks like day to day

We already record and summarise interviews. What would Laidback change?
The interview is one hour. The work before it is sourcing, scoring, scheduling and briefing. The work after is follow up, feedback and pipeline hygiene. I do those parts.
You keep the interview notes you like. I make sure the right person is sitting in the chair.
Different layer of the problemI work on the parts that get the right person into the chair and keep the process honest after they leave it.
On the independent people search benchmark I score 97.80 out of 100. The method and every scored query are published on the benchmark page.