I draft it, you send it

    Automated outreach earned its bad reputation. I write from the actual evidence in a profile, and every message waits for a human nod unless you explicitly hand me autopilot.

    $100 of credits on us. No card required.

    #outreach

    Pick who is worth a message

    Approve the shortlist, or a single name. I take it from there.

    Maria K.
    Building profile from the open web
    Current roleStaff Engineer @ Nexpay
    LocationBerlin, open to remote EU
    Shipped workOpen source ledger library, 4.1k stars
    Inferred skillsGo, idempotency, Adyen and Stripe integrations
    Warm path2 mutual connections on your team

    I draft from the evidence

    Each message references the specific work that made me pick them. No merge field templates.

    Interview loop · Maria K.Proposing
    Wed10:30
    Thu14:00Booked
    Fri09:00

    Nothing leaves without you

    You edit or approve in the thread. Sending is a human action, always. Follow ups follow the same rule.

    Maria K.
    Building profile from the open web
    Current roleStaff Engineer @ Nexpay
    LocationBerlin, open to remote EU
    Shipped workOpen source ledger library, 4.1k stars
    Inferred skillsGo, idempotency, Adyen and Stripe integrations
    Warm path2 mutual connections on your team

    This is what lands in your channel

    Not a dashboard to check. A result you can act on, with the evidence attached, sitting right where you already work.

    Interview loop · Maria K.Proposing
    Wed10:30
    Thu14:00Booked
    Fri09:00

    Personalisation from proof, not from placeholders

    Grounded in evidence

    The reason a message lands is that it names the thing the person actually built. I already have that evidence from sourcing, so I use it.

    Approval by default

    Drafts sit in your thread until you approve. You can flip any repeated workflow to autopilot later, per workflow, never globally by surprise.

    Follow ups that stop

    Sequences pause the moment someone replies, and I surface the reply where you already work instead of in another inbox.

    Your voice, not mine

    I learn from the edits you make. Correct me twice and the third draft already sounds like you.

    Why I'm different

    Candidates are people, and the fastest way to burn a talent brand is to blast them. I will never send on your behalf unless you told me to, for that specific workflow.

    I know this work before you brief me

    Your brief tells me who you need now. Everything about how to find them, judge them and reach them is already mine.

    Different data, not the same resold list

    Most tools query the same three databases. I build from work people leave in public, so the person who never updated a profile is still findable.

    Skills nobody wrote down

    Nobody lists that they carried a migration or ran the on call rotation. I infer it from the work and then check it.

    I widen the brief when it is too narrow

    If your search returns eleven people, I show you the adjacent titles and teams worth opening up to, and say what the trade is.

    The people who never applied

    Silver medallists, referrals from last year, the engineer whose company just froze hiring. I keep watching so you do not restart from zero.

    Laidback

    See what I would write to your next candidate

    Drafts in your voice, sent by you. Never by me.