I am not replacing your ATS
Your ATS records what happened. Your CRM stores who you know. Neither does the work. I sit on top of both, do the work, and write the results back.
$100 of credits on us. No card required.
Every tool that asks to become the new centre of hiring creates work before it removes any.
The difference in one table
| ATS or CRM | Laidback | |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Store and track what already happened | Do the work that creates the records |
| Sourcing | Search your existing database | Search the open web and your database together |
| Coordination | Manual, done by your team | Handled, with approval before anything external |
| Change required | Migration projects and admin | Connect and go, no data migration |
| Together | Stays the system of record | Keeps that record accurate automatically |
What changes when I sit on top of your ATS
Your record stays your record
Stages, notes and outcomes are written back so the ATS reflects reality without evening data entry.
Old pipelines wake up
Silver medallists and warm candidates already in your CRM get resurfaced when a matching role opens.
Minutes, not quarters
There is no implementation project. Connect the tools you use and start with one role.
Over a thousand tools
ATS, CRM, calendar, email, docs and messaging. See the full list on the integrations page.
We just migrated ATS. Please tell me this is not another migration.
'%20fill='%23FCFCFC'/%3e%3cellipse%20cx='304.949'%20cy='107.231'%20rx='43.7363'%20ry='86.7747'%20transform='rotate(-12.9533%20304.949%20107.231)'%20fill='%23FCFCFC'/%3e%3cellipse%20cx='207.296'%20cy='107.321'%20rx='33.7301'%20ry='67.712'%20transform='rotate(-12.2177%20207.296%20107.321)'%20fill='%23121212'/%3e%3cellipse%20cx='301.354'%20cy='103.848'%20rx='31.5494'%20ry='64.0532'%20transform='rotate(-12.2177%20301.354%20103.848)'%20fill='%23121212'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
No migration. Keep your ATS as the system of record. I read from it, act, and write the outcome back.
Connected to your ATS, calendar and email in a few minutes. Over a thousand tools available.
Works on top of your stackWhat IT and ops ask about the overlap
Are you trying to replace our ATS?
No. Your ATS is a system of record and it should stay one. I am the person doing the work that the record describes.
So what do you actually add?
An ATS stores what happened. It does not source candidates, judge them against your bar, write outreach or chase calendars. That is my half of the job.
Will this create duplicate or messy data?
I write back into your existing structure, attribute the source and move the stage. Less manual entry usually means cleaner data, not messier.
I meet your stack where it is, so the only new surface is a chat thread your team already reads.
Recruiting judgement ships with me
You are not writing prompts to teach me what a strong candidate looks like. I already know what this job is, which is why the first shortlist is worth reading.
General agents learn recruiting from your prompts. I was built on it. The bar, the stages, the etiquette of a first message are already in me.
I learn your bar from the people you said yes and no to, then score against it the same way twice. Judgement you can inspect, not a similarity number.
Sourcing, evidence, drafts, follow up, scheduling, ATS write back. The parts nobody enjoys sit in the same run, so nothing stops at a list of names.
Every brief, rejection and debrief stays with me. Role three starts from what roles one and two taught me.
I run on top of your ATS, I do not replace it
Keep your stack, add the coworker
No migration, no rip and replace. I work on top of what you already run.