Laidback as a hireEZ alternative

hireEZ is built for enterprise talent acquisition: a demo, a rollout, an admin, a platform. If your team is smaller than that, the platform is heavier than the problem.

Start for free Book a demo

$100 of credits on us. No card required.

The short answer

Every platform that asks to become the new centre of hiring creates work before it removes any. Six weeks in, half the team is still using the old habit.

BuyerAny team that hires, from ten people up

Time to first shortlistSame day, from one brief in a channel

DataOwn open web index plus your ATS

The difference in one table

	hireEZ	Laidback
Buyer	Enterprise TA teams with an admin and a rollout	Any team that hires, from ten people up
Time to first shortlist	Demo, procurement, implementation	Same day, from one brief in a channel
Data	Aggregated external platforms plus your ATS	Own open web index plus your ATS
Interface	A platform your team logs into	Slack, Teams or WhatsApp
Pricing	Custom, sales led, no free tier	Start free, no seat for hiring managers

The parts that matter when you are not an enterprise

Zero setup weeks

No implementation project, no data migration, no admin certification. Connect what you already run and start with one role.

On top of your stack

Your ATS stays the system of record. I read from it, act, and write the outcome back so nobody does evening data entry.

Evidence, not a score badge

Each ranking points at the repository, paper, product or talk behind it, so a hiring manager can argue with the specifics.

Where hireEZ still wins

Large TA organisations that need enterprise procurement, dedicated support and heavy compliance review will find that shape familiar. That is a legitimate reason to pick them.

#hiring-ops

Dave

We looked at hireEZ. Six week rollout and a seat for everyone who touches hiring.

Laidback

Different shape here. Connect your ATS and calendar, brief me in a channel, first shortlist the same day.

Laidback

Your hiring managers never log into anything. They answer me in the thread they are already in.

No seats for hiring managers

What people ask before they switch

Is hireEZ ever the better choice?

Yes. Large TA organisations with procurement, an admin owner and heavy compliance review will recognise that shape and get real value from it.

What does onboarding actually look like here?

Connect your ATS and calendar, brief me in a channel, get the first shortlist the same day. There is no implementation project.

Where does your candidate data come from?

My own index of the open web: repositories, portfolios, publications, personal sites, company blogs and talks, plus the candidates already sitting in your ATS. Profiles are built from what people ship rather than from a licensed snapshot everyone else also buys.

Do we have to rip anything out to try you?

No. Keep your current stack running, give me one open role, and compare the shortlists. I sit on top of your ATS rather than replacing it.

I meet your stack where it is, so the only new surface is a thread your team already reads.

On the independent people search benchmark I score 97.80 out of 100. The method and every scored query are published on the benchmark page.

I know this work before you brief me

Your brief tells me who you need now. Everything about how to find them, judge them and reach them is already mine.

Built for hiring, not adapted to it

General agents learn recruiting from your prompts. I was built on it. The bar, the stages, the etiquette of a first message are already in me.

Skills that come from real calibration

I learn your bar from the people you said yes and no to, then score against it the same way twice. Judgement you can inspect, not a similarity number.

Workflows that finish the job

Sourcing, evidence, drafts, follow up, scheduling, ATS write back. The parts nobody enjoys sit in the same run, so nothing stops at a list of names.

Context that keeps compounding

Every brief, rejection and debrief stays with me. Role three starts from what roles one and two taught me.