Recruiting emails people answer

Reply rates are not a copywriting problem. They are an evidence problem. A message that proves you read someone's work outperforms a beautifully written template that could have been sent to four hundred people.

Start for free Book a demo

$100 of credits on us. No card required.

Every template here has one bracketed field that cannot be automated: the specific thing you noticed. If you cannot fill it in, do not send the message.

Keep the whole thing under 120 words. Nobody has ever complained that a recruiting email was too short.

Copy the one you need

1. Cold outreach, engineer

First touch, someone who has never heard of you

Subject: [Specific thing they built]

Hi [Name],

I found you through [specific artefact: the repo, the talk, the post]. [One sentence on what was good about it, in plain language, showing you actually looked.]

I am hiring a [Title] at [Company]. We are [one line on what the company does and why the work is hard]. The role owns [the interesting part], and it pays [range].

Worth a 20 minute conversation? If the timing is wrong, tell me and I will leave you alone.

[Your name]

2. Cold outreach, senior or leadership

Someone who gets ten of these a week

Subject: [Company] · [Title]

Hi [Name],

You have probably read a lot of these, so I will be direct.

[Company] is [stage and one line of context]. We are looking for a [Title] to own [the actual mandate, not the job title]. The two hard problems in the first year are [problem one] and [problem two].

I am contacting you because [specific reason tied to their track record, not their title].

Compensation is [range] plus equity. If it is not the right moment, I would still value ten minutes for your read on the market.

[Your name]

3. Follow up, no reply

Four to seven days after the first message

Subject: Re: [original subject]

Hi [Name],

Following up once, then I will stop.

Since I wrote, [something that changed: we closed a round, the team shipped X, the role scope firmed up]. It made me think of you again because [reason].

If it is a no, a one word reply is genuinely fine and I will not chase.

[Your name]

4. Re-engaging a past finalist

Someone who reached a late stage before

Hi [Name],

We spoke in [month, year] about [role]. You got to [stage] and the decision came down to [honest reason, briefly].

A [new role] just opened that fits what you were strongest at: [the specific strength]. I would rather talk to you than start a new search.

Same process, but shorter given what we already know about each other. Interested?

[Your name]

5. Referral request to your team

Internal, to the people who know the market

Hi team,

We are hiring a [Title]. Rather than a general "does anyone know someone", here is exactly who I am looking for:

- Has done: [the concrete experience]
- Probably works at: [three or four company types]
- Would recognise them by: [the signal, e.g. they own the on call rotation for a payments system]

If a name comes to mind, send it to me and I will do the rest. Referral bonus is [amount].

What actually moves reply rate

One specific piece of evidence beats three paragraphs of company pitch. Name the repository, the paper, the product they shipped.

Put the salary range in the first message. It costs you nothing and removes the most common reason people do not reply.

Follow up once, then stop, and say that you will stop. The permission to ignore you is what makes people answer.

Send from a person, not a system address. Reply rate drops sharply the moment a message looks like it came from a platform.

The hard part of outreach was never the writing.

It is having something true and specific to say about a person you found this morning.

I attach that evidence to every profile, then draft the message around it.

What people ask about this

How many follow ups is too many?

One, in most markets. Two if the role is genuinely rare and the first message was strong. Anything past that mostly buys you a reputation.

Does personalisation actually work, or is it a myth?

Fake personalisation does not work. Anyone can tell the difference between a merged field and a sentence about something they built. The second one works, and it is the reason my drafts quote the evidence in the profile.

Do you send these automatically?

No. I draft from the evidence I found and a human on your team approves and sends. Anything a candidate sees waits for a person unless you explicitly turn that off for a habit.